发信人: netiscpu (说不如做), 信区: Unix
标 题: [M]Linux2.1.98中的VFAT分区问题
发信站: 紫 丁 香 (Sun May 10 19:27:55 1998), 转信
Subject:
VFAT not working in 2.1.98
---------
Question:
---------
All vfat or msdos mounted drives appear empty in 2.1.98, even
though the Win95 chkdsk does not find problems. Did anybody else
notice that?
-------
Reply1:
-------
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Martin von Loewis wrote:
> All vfat or msdos mounted drives appear empty in 2.1.98, even
> though the Win95 chkdsk does not find problems. Did anybody else
> notice that?
Do you have vfat/fat support built as modules? There were problems with
the new kmod in 2.1.98 which could prevent them from loading.
-------
Reply2:
-------
I have vfat, etc. configured as modules in 2.1.98 with kmod.
They autoloaded when I mounted a vfat fs, and they're working
just fine. (I configured the floppy driver as a module;
I've got just one ide hd ...)
>
> On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Martin von Loewis wrote:
>
> > All vfat or msdos mounted drives appear empty in 2.1.98, even
> > though the Win95 chkdsk does not find problems. Did anybody else
> > notice that?
>
> Do you have vfat/fat support built as modules? There were problems with
> the new kmod in 2.1.98 which could prevent them from loading.
>
> Steve
>
-- Greg, lee@.Hawaii.edu
--------
Reply3:
-------
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Greg Lee wrote:
> I have vfat, etc. configured as modules in 2.1.98 with kmod.
> They autoloaded when I mounted a vfat fs, and they're working
> just fine. (I configured the floppy driver as a module;
> I've got just one ide hd ...)
>
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Martin von Loewis wrote:
> >
> > > All vfat or msdos mounted drives appear empty in 2.1.98, even
> > > though the Win95 chkdsk does not find problems. Did anybody else
> > > notice that?
> >
> > Do you have vfat/fat support built as modules? There were problems with
> > the new kmod in 2.1.98 which could prevent them from loading.
> >
> > Steve
> >
>
Howdy,
I saw the same thing while tinkering with another problem yesterday in
2.1.97. vfat as module, volumes were mounted and showed normal sizes,
but _no_ visible data. I did _not_ try to write anything :) .. need my
loadlin95 parts. With 2.1.98 and vfat in the kernel, it's working fine.
Cheers,
-Mike
----------
Reply4:
---------
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Martin von Loewis wrote:
> All vfat or msdos mounted drives appear empty in 2.1.98, even
> though the Win95 chkdsk does not find problems. Did anybody else
> notice that?
i did and have seen it earlier than 2.1.98.
bill
-------
Reply5:
-------
I can mount vfat drives alright but whenever i try to mount a loop device
the system completely freezes. It will not even respond to SysRq
requests.
Ralf Wierzbicki
--------
Reply6:
-------
Michael L. Galbraith wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> I saw the same thing while tinkering with another problem yesterday in
> 2.1.97. vfat as module, volumes were mounted and showed normal sizes,
> but _no_ visible data. I did _not_ try to write anything :) .. need my
> loadlin95 parts. With 2.1.98 and vfat in the kernel, it's working fine.
>
vfat as a module, all is well here.
[root@dogbert /win95]# lsmod
Module Size Used by
nls_iso8859-1 2016 1 (autoclean)
nls_cp437 3540 1 (autoclean)
vfat 13364 1 (autoclean)
fat 23612 1 (autoclean) [vfat]
[root@dogbert /win95]# tail netlog.txt
NETDI: ClassInstall(0x9) end
NETDI: ClassInstall (0xa on 0x1a86:0x58) on at Enum\Root\Net\0000
NETDI: Wrote p.ini:DriverName=NETBEUI$, sect: NETBEUI$
NETDI: Wrote p.ini:DriverName=PCIND$, sect: PCIND$
NETDI: Wrote p.ini:DriverName=NETBEUI$, sect: NETBEUI$
NETDI: Copying files for section ne2000.ndis3
NETDI: ClassInstall(0xa) end
NETDI: ClassInstall (0xc on 0x1a86:0x58) on at Enum\Root\Net\0000
NETDI: ClassInstall(0xc) end
[root@dogbert /win95]# pwd
/win95
[root@dogbert /win95]# mount
/dev/hda1 on / type ext2 (rw)
/dev/hda2 on /home type ext2 (rw)
none on /proc type proc (rw)
/dev/hda4 on /win95 type vfat (rw)
[root@dogbert /win95]# uname -a
Linux dogbert 2.1.98 #28 Sat Apr 25 19:18:46 MET DST 1998 i586
--alessandro <asuardi@uninetcom.it> <asuardi@it.oracle.com>
Linux 2.0.33/2.1.98 libc-5.4.44 gcc-2.8.1 binutils-2.9.0.3
"How do you know that the man in the street don't care
and why don't you care if the man in the street don't know ?"
-- Joe Jackson
----------
Reply7:
--------
> Do you have vfat/fat support built as modules? There were problems with
> the new kmod in 2.1.98 which could prevent them from loading.
It is a modules, but it seems to load fine (at least, lsmod displays
it). I'm still in the dark, here.
Martin
-------
Reply8:
-------
hmm...
VFAT compiled into 2.1.98 and I get a hard lockup when I'm writing files
to the system.
I thought the problem might have been OSR2 and FAT-32 support. I can't
really say because I was running the old Win95 upgrade before and I hadn't
tried to use VFAT really until recently.
Brian
--------
End
--------
--
Enjoy Linux!
-----It's FREE!-----
※ 来源:．紫 丁 香 bbs.hit.edu.cn．[FROM: mtlab.hit.edu.cn]