Linux °æ (¾«»ªÇø)
·¢ÐÅÈË: clx (³þÁôÏã), ÐÅÇø: Unix
±ê Ìâ: The GNU Manifesto [GNU ¼Æ»Á¢³¡ÉùÃ÷]
·¢ÐÅÕ¾: ×Ï ¶¡ Ïã (Sat Jun 27 17:41:50 1998), תÐÅ
The GNU Manifesto [GNU ¼Æ»Á¢³¡ÉùÃ÷]
CLDPÉùÃ÷
±¾ÎÄÊÇGNU¼Æ»µÄÎļþÖÐÒë, ²»Êôì¶CLDPµÄÒ»²¿·Ý, Ò²²»ÊÇÔÚ
CLDP ¼Æ»ÏÂÍê³ÉµÄ. CLDP »ùì¶Linux ÓëGNU¼Æ»µÄÉîºñÔ¨Ô´,
ÒýÓôËÎÄÕÂ, Ï£ÍûÈÃLinuxµÄʹÓÃÕ߶ÔGNUÓиü½øÒ»²½µÄÁ˽â.
СÆô
±¾ÎÄÓ¢ÎÄÔÎÄ¿Éì¶<http://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.html>
»òÕßÈκεÄemacs ¸½µÄÎļþÖÐÕÒµ½¡£
±¾ÎÄÔÎÄÓÉRichard StallmanÔÚGNU¼Æ»®¿ªÊ¼Ö®³õÍê³É¡£ ÓÃÒÔ
Ñ°ÇóÖÚÈ˵IJÎÓë¼°Ö§³Ö¡£¸Õ¿ªÊ¼¼¸ÄêÓÐÉÔ΢µÄÐÞÕý£¬ÒÔ·´Ó¦¼Æ
»®µÄ·¢Õ¹¡£ÒòΪºÜ¶àÈ˶¼¿´¹ý±¾ÎÄ£¬ËùÒÔ±¾ÎĽ«»á±£³ÖÔ×´£¬
²»ÔÙÐ޸ġ£
Óû¶ÔGNU ¼Æ»®ÓиüÏêϸµÄÁ˽⣬Çë¿´<http://www.gnu.org/>
±¾ÎÄÖÐÒëÓÉÏôÓÀÇì¶ÀÁ¢Íê³É¡£±¾ÖÐÒëÎĽ÷´ú±íÒëÕ߶ÔÔÎÄµÄ ÁË
½â£¬½ö¹©²Î¿¼Ö®Ó㬲»ÄÜ´ú±íÔ×÷Õß±¾Òâ, Ô×÷ÕßÒàûÓÐ Õýʽ
ÈÏÖ¤±¾ÎĵȼÛì¶Æä±¾Òâ¡£±¾ÎĵÄÔðÈιéÊôì¶ÒëÕߣ¬ÓëÔ ×÷ÕßÎÞ
¹Ø£¬ÈçÓëÔÎÄÓÐËù³öÈëÓ¦ÒÔÔÎÄΪ׼¡£
Èç¹ûÄú¶ÔÒëÎÄÓÐÈκÎÒâ¼ûÓëÖ¸½Ì£¬»¶Ó¼ÄÖÁ
yhsiao@cae.wisc.edu£¬ ÒÔΪÏ´θüÐ²ο¼¡£±¾ÖÐÒëÎÄ×îááÒ»
´Î¸üÐÂΪ1997Äê11Ô¡£
±¾ÎÄΪ³õ¸å, »¶ÓÀ´ÐÅÖ¸Õý.
Copyright (C) 1985 Richard M. Stallman (Copying
permission notice at the end.)
±¾ÎÄ°æȨÓÉRichard M. Stallman ËùÓÐ ÕâÊÇ1985ÄêµÄÎÄÕÂ
£¨°æȨÉùÃ÷ÔÚÎÄÄ©£©
Copyright(C), 1995, 1997
What's GNU? Gnu's Not Unix!
ʲ÷áÊÇGNU ? Gnu ÊÇ [Gnu's Not Unix] µÄËõд.
GNU, which stands for Gnu's Not Unix, is the name for
the complete Unix-compatible software system which I am
writing so that I can give it away free to everyone who
can use it. Several other volunteers are helping me.
Contributions of time, money, programs and equipment
are greatly needed.
GNU, Gnu's Not UnixµÄËõд£¬ÊÇÎÒÕýÔÚдµÄÒ»¸öÓëUNIXÏàÈݵÄ
ÈíÌåϵͳ£¬ Ä¿µÄÔÚì¶ÎÒÄܹ»×ÔÓɵİѴËϵͳ¸øÏëÒªÓÃËüµÄÈË¡£
Óкü¸¸ö×ÔÔ¸ÕßÔÚ°ï ÎÒµÄæ¡£ÎÒÃǷdz£µÄÐèÒª£¨Ï£Íû£©ÄúÄܹ»
¹±Ï×ʱ¼ä¡¢½ðÇ®¡¢³Ìʽ»òÕßÊÇ »úÆ÷¡£
So far we have an Emacs text editor with Lisp for
writing editor commands, a source level debugger, a
yacc-compatible parser generator, a linker, and around
35 utilities. A shell (command interpreter) is nearly
completed. A new portable optimizing C compiler has
compiled itself and may be released this year. An
initial kernel exists but many more features are needed
to emulate Unix. When the kernel and compiler are
finished, it will be possible to distribute a GNU
system suitable for program development. We will use
@TeX{} as our text formatter, but an nroff is being
worked on. We will use the free, portable X window
system as well. After this we will add a portable
Common Lisp, an Empire game, a spreadsheet, and
hundreds of other things, plus on-line documentation.
We hope to supply, eventually, everything useful that
normally comes with a Unix system, and more.
µ½Ä¿Ç°ÎªÖ¹ÎÒÃÇÒѾÓÐÁËÒ»¸öEmacs±à¼Æ÷£¬¿ÉÓÃLispд¾Þ¼¯Ãü
Áһ¸öÔʼ Âë²ã´ÎµÄ³ý´íÆ÷£¬Ò»¸öÓëyaccÏàÈݵÄÓï·¨·ÖÎö³Ì
ʽ²úÉúÆ÷£¬Ò»¸öÁª½áÆ÷£¬ ºÍ´ó¸Å35¸ö¹«ÓóÌʽ¡£ÓÐÒ»¸öShell
£¨ÃüÁî½âÒëÆ÷£©ÒѾ¼¸ºõÍê³ÉÁË¡£ Ò»¸öеġ¢Ò×ì¶ÒÆÖ²µÄ
(portable)¡¢ÓÐ×î¼Ñ»¯¹¦ÄܵģñàÒëÆ÷ÒѾ¿ÉÒÔ×ÔÎÒ±àÒ룬 ¿É
ÒÔÔÚ½ñÄê·¢±íÁË¡£ÓÐÒ»¸ö³õÆڵĺËÐĵ«ÊÇÐèÒª¸ü¶àµÄÌØÐÔÒÔÄ£
ÄâUNIX ¡£µ±ºËÐĺͱàÒëÆ÷¶¼½áÊøáᣬÎÒÃǾÍÄܹ»´«²¥Ò»¸öÎȶ¨
µÄ£¬ÊʺϷ¢Õ¹³Ìʽ µÄGNU ϵͳ¡£ÎÒÃÇ»áʹÓÃ@TeX{}µ±ÎÒÃǵÄÎÄ
×ÖÅÅ°æÆ÷£¬µ«ÊÇÒ²ÕýÔÚ׫ дһ¸önroff ¡£ÎÒÃÇÒ²»áÓÃÃâ·ÑµÄ¡¢
portableµÄ£ØÊÓ´°ÏµÍ³¡£Ö®ááÎÒÃÇ »á¼ÓÒ»¸öportableµÄCommon
Lisp ¡¢Ò»¸öEmpireÓÎÏ·¡¢Ò»¸öÊÔËã±í¡¢ºÍ ÆäËû¸÷ʽ¸÷ÑùµÄ¶«
Î÷£¬ÒÔ¼°ÏßÉϵÄÎļþ¡£ÎÒÃÇÏ£Íû×îááÄÜÌṩһ°ãUNIX ϵͳËùÄÜ
ÌṩµÄÿһ¼þÓÐÓõĶ«Î÷£¬ÉõÖÁÒª¸ü¶à¡£
GNU will be able to run Unix programs, but will not be
identical to Unix. We will make all improvements that
are convenient, based on our experience with other
operating systems. In particular, we plan to have
longer filenames, file version numbers, a crashproof
file system, filename completion perhaps,
terminal-independent display support, and perhaps
eventually a Lisp-based window system through which
several Lisp programs and ordinary Unix programs can
share a screen. Both C and Lisp will be available as
system programming languages. We will try to support
UUCP, MIT Chaosnet, and Internet protocols for
communication.
GNU Ò»¶¨Äܹ»Ö´ÐÐUnixµÄ³Ìʽ£¬µ«ÊDz»»áºÍUnixÍêÈ«Ò»Ñù¡£ÎÒ
ÃÇ»á¸ù¾Ý ÎÒÃÇÔÚÆäËü×÷ҵϵͳÉϵľÑéÀ´¸Ä½øËùÓпÉÒÔÔö¼Ó±ã
ÀûÐԵĵط½¡£ÌرðÊÇ ÎÒÃǼƻ®ÓµÓнϳ¤µÄµµÃû¡¢µµ°¸°æ±¾ºÅ
Âë¡¢Ò»¸ö²»Åµ±»úµÄµµ°¸ÏµÍ³£¬ »òÐí»¹ÒªÓÐ×Ô¶¯µµÃû²¹È«¡¢Óë
Öն˻úÎ޹صÄÏÔʾ֧Ԯ¡¢¿ÉÄÜ×îáỹҪÓÐ Ò»¸öÒÔLispΪ»ù´¡µÄ
ÊÓ´°ÏµÍ³£¬¿ÉÒÔʹµÄºÃ¼¸¸öLisp³ÌʽºÍÆÕͨµÄUnix ³Ìʽ¹²Í¬·Ö
ÏëÒ»¸öÓ©Ä»¡££ÃºÍLisp¶¼½«»á³ÉΪϵͳµÄ³ÌʽÓïÑÔ¡£ÎÒÃÇ»á Éè
·¨Ö§Ô®UUCP£¬MIT Chaosnet£¬¼°InternetµÄͨѶж¨¡£
GNU is aimed initially at machines in the 68000/16000
class with virtual memory, because they are the easiest
machines to make it run on. The extra effort to make it
run on smaller machines will be left to someone who
wants to use it on them.
GNU ×î³õµÄÄ¿±êÊÇÓÐÐéÄâ¼ÆÒäÌ壬68000/16000 ϵÁеĻúÆ÷£¬
ÒòΪÕâ ÊÇ×îÈÝÒ×·¢Õ¹³ÌʽÀ´ÊµÏÖGNU µÄ»úÆ÷¡£Ê£ÏÂÀ´£¬ÈÃGNU
ÄÜÔÚÆäËü½ÏСµÄ»ú Æ÷Ö´ÐеŤ×÷£¬½«»áÁô¸øÄÇЩϣÍûÄÜÔÚÕâЩ
»úÆ÷ÉÏʹÓÃGNU µÄÈË¡£
To avoid horrible confusion, please pronounce the `G'
in the word `GNU' when it is the name of this project.
ΪÁ˱ÜÃâ¿ÉŵĻìÏý£¬Çë¸÷λÌáµ½´Ë¼Æ»®µÄÃû×Ögnu ʱÎñ±ØÒª
°Ñ£Ç µÄÒô·¢³öÀ´¡£Òë×¢: gnu ÒôÒë ¸ðÅ£¬·ÇÖ޵ĴóÁçÑò¡£
Who Am I?
ÎÒÊÇË£¿
I am Richard Stallman, inventor of the original
much-imitated EMACS editor, formerly at the Artificial
Intelligence Lab at MIT. I have worked extensively on
compilers, editors, debuggers, command interpreters,
the Incompatible Timesharing System and the Lisp
Machine operating system. I pioneered
terminal-independent display support in ITS. Since then
I have implemented one crashproof file system and two
window systems for Lisp machines, and designed a third
window system now being implemented; this one will be
ported to many systems including use in GNU.
[Historical note: The window system project was not
completed; GNU now plans to use the X window system.]
ÎÒÊÇRichard Stallman£¬ÊDZ»ºÜ¶à±à¼Æ÷Ä£·ÂµÄEmacs ±à¼Æ÷
µÄÔ´´Õߣ¬ ÏÈÇ°ÔÚÂéÊ¡Àí¹¤Ñ§ÔºÈ˹¤ÖÇ»ÛʵÑéÊÒÈν̡£ÎÒµ±Ê±
ÔÚ±àÒëÆ÷¡¢±à¼Æ÷¡¢ ³ý´íÆ÷¡¢ÃüÁî½âÒëÆ÷¡¢Incompatible
Timesharing System ÒÔ¼°Lisp»ú Æ÷½ÔÓй㷺µÄÑо¿¡£´ÓÄÇʱ
ÆðÎҾͷ¢Õ¹ÁËÒ»¸ö²»Åµ±»úµÄµµ°¸ÏµÍ³¼°Á½ ¸öLisp»úÆ÷µÄÊÓ´°
ϵͳ¶øÇÒÉè¼ÆÁ˵ÚÈý¸öÏÖÔÚÕýÔÚ·¢Õ¹ÖеÄÊÓ´°ÏµÍ³£» ÕâÒ»¸ö½«
»áÒÆÖ²µ½°üÀ¨GNU ÔÚÄڵĺܶàϵͳÉÏ¡£¡²°´£ºÕâ¸öÊÓ´°ÏµÍ³µÄ
¼Æ»²¢Ã»ÓÐÍê³É£»GNU ÏÖÔڼƻʹÓãØÊÓ´°ÏµÍ³µ±×÷ËüµÄʹÓÃ
Õß½éÃ桳
Why I Must Write GNU
ÎÒΪʲ÷áÒ»¶¨ÒªÐ´GNU
I consider that the golden rule requires that if I like
a program I must share it with other people who like
it. Software sellers want to divide the users and
conquer them, making each user agree not to share with
others. I refuse to break solidarity with other users
in this way. I cannot in good conscience sign a
nondisclosure agreement or a software license
agreement. For years I worked within the Artificial
Intelligence Lab to resist such tendencies and other
inhospitalities, but eventually they had gone too far:
I could not remain in an institution where such things
are done for me against my will.
ÎÒ°Ñ¡ºÈç¹ûÎÒϲ»¶Ò»¸ö³ÌʽµÄ»°£¬ÄÇÎÒ¾ÍÓ¦¸Ã·ÖÏí¸øÆäËûϲ»¶
Õâ¸ö³Ì ʽµÄÈË¡»Õâ¾ä»°µ±³ÉÎÒµÄ×ùÓÒÃú¡£ÈíÌåÉÌÓû¸ö±ð»÷ÆÆʹ
ÓÃÕߣ¬Ê¹ËûÃÇͬ Òâ²»°ÑÈíÌåºÍËûÈË·ÖÏí¡£ÎҾܾøÒÔÕâÖÖ·½Ê½ÆÆ
»µÊ¹ÓÃÕßµÄÍŽᡣÎÒµÄÁ¼ ÐÄʹÎÒ²»»áÇ©ÏÂÒ»¸ö±£ÃܺÏÔ¼»òÊÇÈí
ÌåÊÚȨºÏÔ¼¡£ÎÒÔÚMIT AIʵÑé ÊÒ¶Ô¿¹ÕâÖÖÇ÷ÊƺÍÆäËûµÄ²»ÓÑÉÆ
ºÃ¼¸Ä꣬µ«ÊÇ×îááÊÂÇéÔã¸âµ½£ºÎÒû°ì·¨ ´ýÔÚÒ»¸ö´¦ÀíÊÂÇéµÄ
·½·¨ÓëÎÒµÄÒâÔ¸ÏàÎ¥µÄ»ú¹¹¡£
So that I can continue to use computers without
dishonor, I have decided to put together a sufficient
body of free software so that I will be able to get
along without any software that is not free. I have
resigned from the AI lab to deny MIT any legal excuse
to prevent me from giving GNU away.
ΪÁËÎÒÄܲ»¶Ô²»ÆðÁ¼ÐÄ[dishonor]Ï£¬¼ÌÐøʹÓõçÄÔ£¬ÎÒ¾ö¶¨
Òª¼¯ºÏÒ»×ã ¹»Á¿µÄ×ÔÓÉÈíÌåÒÔʹÎÒÄܹ»²»Ê¹ÓÃÄÇЩ²»×ÔÓɵÄÈí
Ìå¡£ÎÒÀ뿪AIʵÑéÊÒ ÎªµÄ¾ÍÊDz»¸øMIT ÓÐÈκη¨ÂÉÉϵĽå¿ÚÀ´
×èÖ¹ÎÒ°ÑGNU Ë͸øÆäËûÈË¡£
Why GNU Will Be Compatible with Unix
Ϊʲ÷á GNU ½«»áºÍ UNIX ÏàÈÝ
Unix is not my ideal system, but it is not too bad. The
essential features of Unix seem to be good ones, and I
think I can fill in what Unix lacks without spoiling
them. And a system compatible with Unix would be
convenient for many other people to adopt.
UNIX²¢²»ÊÇÎÒÀíÏëµÄϵͳ£¬µ«ÊÇËüÒ²²»ÊÇÌ«²î¡£UNIX»ù±¾µÄÌØ
ÐÔËƺõÊÇ ÂùÓÅÁ¼µÄ£¬¶øÇÒÎÒÏëÎÒÄܹ»ÔÚ²»ÎþÉüÔÓÐÌØÐÔ֮ϼÓ
½øUnixȱÉٵĶ«Î÷ ¡£¿öÇÒÒ»¸öºÍUNIXÏàÈݵÄϵͳ¿ÉÒÔÈý϶àµÄ
ÈËÈÝÒ×½ÓÊÜ¡£
How GNU Will Be Available
GNU ½«ÒªÈçºÎÈÃËûÈËÈ¡µÃ
GNU is not in the public domain. Everyone will be
permitted to modify and redistribute GNU, but no
distributor will be allowed to restrict its further
redistribution. That is to say, proprietary
modifications will not be allowed. I want to make sure
that all versions of GNU remain free.
GNU ²»Êǹ«¿ªµÄ£¬Ã»ÓÐÔ¼ÊøµÄÈíÌå[public domain]¡£ÎÒÃǽ«»á
ÔÊÐíÿ Ò»¸öÈËÐ޸ļ°´«²¥ GNU µ«ÊǾø²»ÔÊÐí´«²¥Õ߶ÔËû´«²¥
µÄ³ÌʽÔÙ¼Ó½øÆä ËûµÄÏÞÖÆ¡£¾ÍÊÇ˵£¬ ²»ÔÊÐí½«ÐÞ¸ÄááµÄ³Ìʽ
ռΪ¼ºÓС£ÎÒҪȷ¶¨ GNU ËùÓеİ汾½ÔÄܱ£³Ö×ÔÓÉ¡£
Why Many Other Programmers Want to Help
Ϊʲ÷áÓкܶà³ÌʽÉè¼ÆÕßÔ¸Òâ°ïæ
I have found many other programmers who are excited
about GNU and want to help.
ÎÒ·¢ÏÖÓкܶà³ÌʽÉè¼ÆÕ߶ÔGNU ¸ÐÐËȤ¶øÇÒÔ¸Òâ°ïæ ¡£
Many programmers are unhappy about the
commercialization of system software. It may enable
them to make more money, but it requires them to feel
in conflict with other programmers in general rather
than feel as comrades. The fundamental act of
friendship among programmers is the sharing of
programs; marketing arrangements now typically used
essentially forbid programmers to treat others as
friends. The purchaser of software must choose between
friendship and obeying the law. Naturally, many decide
that friendship is more important. But those who
believe in law often do not feel at ease with either
choice. They become cynical and think that programming
is just a way of making money.
ºÜ¶à³ÌʽÉè¼ÆÕ߶ÔϵͳÈíÌåÉÌÒµ»¯¸Ðµ½²»Ôá£Õâ¿ÉÄÜʹËûÃÇ׬
¸ü¶àµÄÇ® £¬µ«ÊÇ´óÖÂÉÏÕâʹµÃËûÃÇÓУ¬ÓëÆäËûµÄ³ÌʽÉè¼ÆÕß³å
Í»£¬¶ø·Ç´ó¼Ò ¶¼ÊÇͬ־µÄ¸Ð¾õ¡£³ÌʽÉè¼ÆÕ߶ÔÓÑÒêµÄ×î»ù±¾±í
ÏÖ¾ÍÊǰѳÌʽ·ÖÏí³öÀ´ £»¶øµ±Ç°µÄÊг¡¾ºÕù¼Ü¹¹»ù±¾ÉϽûÖ¹³Ì
ʽÉè¼ÆÕ߱˴ËÖ®¼äÊÓΪÅóÓÑ¡£ÈíÌå ¹ºÂòÕß±ØÐëÔÚÓÑÒêºÍÊØ·¨Ö®
¼ä×öһѡÔñ¡£×ÔÈ»µØ£¬ÓкܶàÑ¡ÔñÁËÓÑÒê±È ½ÏÖØÒª¡£µ«ÊÇÄÇЩ
ÏàÐÅ·¨ÂɵÄÈ˳£³£Ã»°ì·¨°²ÐĵÄ×öÏÂÈÎһѡÔñ¡£ËûÃÇ ±äµÃ·ßÊÀ
¼ÉË×ÇÒÈÏΪд³Ìʽֻ²»¹ýÊÇ׬ǮµÄÒ»ÖÖ·½·¨¶øÒÑ¡£
By working on and using GNU rather than proprietary
programs, we can be hospitable to everyone and obey the
law. In addition, GNU serves as an example to inspire
and a banner to rally others to join us in sharing.
This can give us a feeling of harmony which is
impossible if we use software that is not free. For
about half the programmers I talk to, this is an
important happiness that money cannot replace.
͸¹ý׫д¼°Ê¹ÓÃGNU ¶ø·Ç˽ÓеijÌʽ£¬ÎÒÃÇ¿ÉÒÔÈÈÇéµÄ¶Ô´ýÿ
Ò»¸öÈ˲¢ ÇÒ×ñÊØ·¨ÂÉ¡£´ËÍ⣬GNU ¸üÊÇÒ»¸ö¼¤·¢Ó뼯½á´ó¼ÒºÍ
ÎÒÃÇÒ»Æð·ÖÏíµÄµä ¡õ¼°ºÅÖ¾¡£ÕâÑù×ÓÄܹ»¸øÎÒÃÇÒ»ÖÖºÍгµÄ¸Ð
¾õ£¬Õâ¸Ð¾õÊÇÎÒÃÇΪÄÇЩ²» ×ÔÓɵÄÈíÌ幤×÷Ëù²»Äܵõ½µÄ¡£´ó
¸ÅÓÐÒ»°ëºÍÎÒ̸¹ýµÄ³ÌʽÉè¼ÆʦÈÏΪ ÕâÊÇÒ»¸ö½ðÇ®Ëù²»ÄÜÌæ»»
µÄ¡¢ºÜÖØÒªµÄÏíÊÜ¡£
How You Can Contribute
Äã¿ÉÒÔÔõÑù¹±Ï×
I am asking computer manufacturers for donations of
machines and money. I'm asking individuals for
donations of programs and work.
ÎÒÇëµçÄÔÖÆÔìÉ̾èÏ×»úÆ÷¼°½ðÇ®¡£ÎÒºôÓõ¸öÈ˹±Ï׳ÌʽÓ뾫Á¦¡
£
One consequence you can expect if you donate machines
is that GNU will run on them at an early date. The
machines should be complete, ready to use systems,
approved for use in a residential area, and not in need
of sophisticated cooling or power.
Èç¹ûÄã¹±Ï×»úÆ÷µÄ»°£¬Äã¿ÉÒÔÆÚ´ýµÄÒ»¸ö½á¹û¾ÍÊÇGNU ¿ÉÒÔÔç
µãÔÚÄãÌá ¹©µÄ»úÆ÷ÉÏÃæÖ´ÐС£»úÆ÷±ØÐëÊÇÍêÕûµÄ¡¢ÂíÉÏ¿ÉÓõÄ
ϵͳ£¬¿ÉÒÔÔÚסլ ÇøÄÚʹÓ㬶øÇÒ²»ÐëÒª¸´ÔÓµÄÀäÈ´¼°µçÁ¦Ïµ
ͳ¡£
I have found very many programmers eager to contribute
part-time work for GNU. For most projects, such
part-time distributed work would be very hard to
coordinate; the independently-written parts would not
work together. But for the particular task of replacing
Unix, this problem is absent. A complete Unix system
contains hundreds of utility programs, each of which is
documented separately. Most interface specifications
are fixed by Unix compatibility. If each contributor
can write a compatible replacement for a single Unix
utility, and make it work properly in place of the
original on a Unix system, then these utilities will
work right when put together. Even allowing for Murphy
to create a few unexpected problems, assembling these
components will be a feasible task. (The kernel will
require closer communication and will be worked on by a
small, tight group.)
ÎÒ·¢ÏÖÓкܶàµÄ³Ìʽʦ¿ÊÍûΪGNU ¹±Ïײ¿·Ý¡õϾµÄ¾«Á¦¡£¶Ô´ó
²¿·ÖµÄ¼Æ »¶øÑÔ£¬Èç´Ë²¿·ÝµÄ¡¢·ÖÉ¢µÄ¹¤×÷·Ç³£ÄÑÒÔе÷£»´ó
¼Ò¶ÀÁ¢Ð´µÄ¸÷²¿·Ý ¿ÉÄÜû°ì·¨ºÏÔÚÒ»Æð¹¤×÷¡£µ«ÊǾÍÈ¡´úUnix
µÄÌض¨ÈÎÎñÀ´Ëµ¾ÍûÓÐÕâ¸ö ÎÊÌâ¡£Ò»¸öÍêÕûµÄUnixϵͳ°üÀ¨ÁË
ÉÏ°Ù¸ö¹¤¾ß³Ìʽ£¬Ã¿Ò»¸ö³Ìʽ¶¼·Ö±ð ÓÐËùÃèÊö¡£´ó²¿·ÖµÄ½çÃæ
¹æ¸ñ¶¼ÒòUnixÏàÈÝÐÔµÄÔµ¹Ê¶øÊǹ̶¨µÄ¡£Èçÿ Ò»¸ö¹±Ï×ÕßÄܹ»
дһ¸öij¸öUnix¹¤¾ßµÄÏàÈÝÌæ´úÆ·£¬ÈÃËüÔÚUnixÏÂÄÜÕý È·µÄÈ¡
´úÔÀ´³ÌʽµÄ¹¤×÷£¬ÄÇ÷áÕâЩ¹¤¾ß¼¯ºÏÔÚÒ»Æðʱ±ãÄÜÕý³£¹¤
×÷¡£ ¼´Ê¹ÈÃĪ·Ç¶¨ÂÉÔÙÖÆÔìһЩ³öºõÒâÁϵÄÎÊÌ⣬°ÑÕâЩ²¿·Ý
×éºÏÆðÀ´ÈÔÈ» ÊǼþ¿ÉÐеŤ×÷¡££¨ÏµÍ³ºËÐĵŤ×÷¾ÍÐèÒª½ÏÃÜ
Çеŵͨ£¬ÇÒÖ»ÓÐһȺ ½ôÃܵÄС×éÄܹ»²Î¼Ó£©
If I get donations of money, I may be able to hire a
few people full or part time. The salary won't be high
by programmers' standards, but I'm looking for people
for whom building community spirit is as important as
making money. I view this as a way of enabling
dedicated people to devote their full energies to
working on GNU by sparing them the need to make a
living in another way.
Èç¹ûÓÐÈ˹±Ï×½ðÇ®£¬ÄÇ÷áÎÒ¾ÍÄܹ»Ç뼸¸öÈ«Ö°»òÁÙʱµÄÈË¡£ÒÔ
³ÌʽʦµÄ ±ê×¼À´Ëµ£¬Õâнˮ²»ÊǺܸߣ¬µ«ÊÇÎÒÒªÕÒµÄÊÇÄÇЩÈÏ
Ϊ½¨Á¢ÉçÇøÒâʶ [community spirit]ºÍ׬ǮһÑùÖØÒªµÄÈË¡£ÎÒ
ÈÏΪÌṩ·îÏ×µÄÈËÁíÒ»ÖÖ Î¬³ÖÉú¼ÆµÄ·½Ê½ÊÇʹËûÃÇÄܹ»È«ÐÄÈ«
Á¦Í¶ÈëGNU ¹¤×÷µÄÒ»ÖÖ·½·¨¡£
Why All Computer Users Will Benefit
Ϊʲ÷áËùÓеĵçÄÔʹÓÃÕ߶¼»áÊÜÒæ
Once GNU is written, everyone will be able to obtain
good system software free, just like air.
Ö»ÒªGNU һдºÃ£¬Ã¿¸öÈ˶¼Äܹ»×ÔÓɵÄÈ¡µÃÓÅÁ¼µÄϵͳÈíÌ壬
¾ÍÏñ¿ÕÆøÒ» Ñù¡£
This means much more than just saving everyone the
price of a Unix license. It means that much wasteful
duplication of system programming effort will be
avoided. This effort can go instead into advancing the
state of the art.
Õâ²»Ö»Êǽö½öÊ¡Ï´ó¼ÒÒ»±ÊUnixµÄ°æȨ·Ñ¶øÒÑ¡£Õâ¸üÒâζÖø´ó
¼Ò¿ÉÒﱆ Ãâ°×°×À˷ѵôÖظ´Éè¼ÆϵͳµÄ¹¤×÷¡£ÕâÊ¡ÏÂÀ´µÄÁ¦Æø
¿ÉÒÔת¶øÔö½ø´Ëϵ ͳµÄ¼¼Êõ²ã´ÎÓëÆ·ÖÊ¡£[ the state of the
art. ]
Complete system sources will be available to everyone.
As a result, a user who needs changes in the system
will always be free to make them himself, or hire any
available programmer or company to make them for him.
Users will no longer be at the mercy of one programmer
or company which owns the sources and is in sole
position to make changes.
ÿһ¸öÈ˶¼ÄÜÈ¡µÃÍêÕûµÄ³ÌʽÂë¡£Òò´Ë£¬ÐèÒª¸ü¸ÄϵͳµÄʹÓÃ
Õß×ÜÊÇÄÜ ×ÔÓɵÄ×ÔÐÐÐÞ¸ÄÖ®£¬»ò¹ÍÓÃÈκÎÄܹ»Ê¤ÈεijÌʽʦ»ò
¹«Ë¾À´ÌæËû×öÕâ¼þ Ê¡£Ê¹ÓÃÕß²»ÔÚÐèÒª¿´Ä³Ò»¸öÓµÓÐÔʼÂëµÄ
³Ìʽʦ»ò¹«Ë¾µÄÁ³É«¡ªÈç¹û Ö»ÓÐËûÃÇÏë×÷Щ¸ü¸ÄµÄ»°¡£
Schools will be able to provide a much more educational
environment by encouraging all students to study and
improve the system code. Harvard's computer lab used to
have the policy that no program could be installed on
the system if its sources were not on public display,
and upheld it by actually refusing to install certain
programs. I was very much inspired by this.
ѧУ½«Äܹ»Í¸¹ý¹ÄÀøËùÓеÄѧÉúѧϰ¼°¸Ä½ø³ÌʽÂëµÄ·½Ê½Ìṩ
¸ü¸»½ÌÓýÐÔ µÄ»·¾³¡£¹þ·ðµÄµçÄÔʵÑéÊÒÔø¾ÓÐÕâÑùÒ»¸öÕþ²ß£º
²»ÔÊÐíÒ»¸ö²»Äܹ«¿ªÕ¹ ʾÔʼÂëµÄ³Ìʽ°²×°µ½ÏµÍ³ÀïÃ棬¶øÇÒ
¾Ü¾ø°²×°Ä³Ð©³ÌʽÒÔչʾ¹á³¹µÄ¾ö ÐÄ¡£ÎÒ´ÓÕâ¼þʵõ½²»ÉÙÆô
·¢¡£
Finally, the overhead of considering who owns the
system software and what one is or is not entitled to
do with it will be lifted.
×îáᣬ˸ÃÓµÓÐÕâ¸öϵͳÈíÌåµÄ¹ËÂǼ°Ë±»ÔÊÐí»ò²»ÔÊÐíÔËÓÃ
ÕâÈíÌå×öʲ ÷áʵÄÏÞÖƶ¼»á½â³ý¡£
Arrangements to make people pay for using a program,
including licensing of copies, always incur a
tremendous cost to society through the cumbersome
mechanisms necessary to figure out how much (that is,
which programs) a person must pay for. And only a
police state can force everyone to obey them. Consider
a space station where air must be manufactured at great
cost: charging each breather per liter of air may be
fair, but wearing the metered gas mask all day and all
night is intolerable even if everyone can afford to pay
the air bill. And the TV cameras everywhere to see if
you ever take the mask off are outrageous. It's better
to support the air plant with a head tax and chuck the
masks.
ΪÁËʹʹÓóÌʽÕ߸¶·Ñ£¬°üÀ¨ÊÚȨÊýÁ¿£¬±ØÐë͸¹ýÀÛ׸µÄ»úÖÆ
À´²âÁ¿Ê¹Óà ÕßÐèҪΪÄĸö³Ìʽ¸¶³ö¶àÉÙÇ®£¬×ÜÊÇʹÉç»á¸¶³ö´ó
Á¿µÄ³É±¾¡£¶øÇÒÖ»Óо¯ ·½ÄÜʹÿ¸öÈ˶¼×ñÊØÖ®¡£¿¼ÂÇÒ»¸ö±ØÐë
Óúܸߵijɱ¾ÖÆÔì¿ÕÆøµÄÌ«¿ÕÕ¾£º ¶ÔÿºôÎüÒ»Éý¿ÕÆøÊÕ·Ñ¿ÉÄÜ
Âù¹«Æ½µÄ£¬µ«ÊdzÉÌì´øÖø¿ÕÆø¼Ç¼Æ÷µÄ¿ÚÕÖÊÇ ÎÞ·¨ÈÌÊܵģ¬¼´
ʹÿ¸öÈ˶¼ÓÐÄÜÁ¦¸¶¿ÕÆø·Ñ¡£¶øÇÒµ½´¦¶¼ÊǼàÊÓÆ÷¼ì²éÄã ÊÇ·ñ
ÄõôºôÎüÕÖÊÇÒ»ÖÖÎêÈè¡£Õ⻹²»ÈçÄõôÃæÕÖ£¬ËãÈËÍ·½ÉË°»¹±È
½ÏºÃ¡£
Copying allor parts of a program is as natural to a
programmer as breathing, and as productive. It ought to
be as free.
¿½±´´ó²¿·Ý»ò²¿·ÝµÄ³Ìʽ¶ÔÒ»¸ö³Ìʽʦ¶øÑÔÊǺͺôÎüÒ»Ñù×ÔÈ»
ÇÒ¾ß ÓÐÉú²úÁ¦µÄÊ¡£ ÕâÓ¦¸ÃÊǺͺôÎüÒ»Ñù×ÔÓɵġ£
Some Easily Rebutted Objections to GNU's Goals
һЩ GNU µÄÀíÏëÈÝÒ×ÔâÊÜ·´²µµÄµØ·½
"Nobody will use it if it is free, because that
means they can't rely on any support."
¡ºÈç¹ûËüÊÇÃâ·ÑµÄ»°¾ÍûÓÐÈË»áÓÃËü£¬ÒòΪÕâ±íʾ ËûÃÇû
ÓÐÈκÎÐÖú¿ÉÒÔÒÀÀµ¡£¡»
"You have to charge for the program to pay for
providing the support."
¡ºÄã±ØÐë¶Ô³ÌʽÊÕ·Ñ£¬ÓÃÀ´Ö§³ÖÌṩ֧Ԯ·þÎñËùÐèÖ®·Ñ
Óᣡ»
If people would rather pay for GNU plus service than
get GNU free without service, a company to provide just
service to people who have obtained GNU free ought to
be profitable.
Èç¹ûÓÐÈËÄþÔ¸»¨Ç®ÂòÓÐÊÛáá·þÎñµÄGNU ¶ø·ÇÃâ·ÑµÃµ½Ã»ÓзþÎñ
µÄGNU £¬ Ò»¼ÒרÃÅΪÄÇЩÃâ·ÑÄõ½GNU µÄÈËÌṩ·þÎñµÄ¹«Ë¾Ó¦
¸Ã»áºÜ׬Ǯ¡£
We must distinguish between support in the form of real
programming work and mere handholding. The former is
something one cannot rely on from a software vendor. If
your problem is not shared by enough people, the vendor
will tell you to get lost.
ÎÒÃDZØÐë±æ±ð³ÌʽάÐÞÖ§Ô®ºÍ´¿·þÎñÖ§Ô®·½Ê½ÉϵIJ»Í¬¡£Ç°Õß
ÊÇÈíÌ幫 ˾Ëù²» ÄÜÒÀ¿¿µÄ¡£Èç¹ûûÓÐ×ã¹»¶àµÄÈ˺ÍÄãÓÐÏàͬ
µÄÎÊÌ⣬ÈíÌ幫˾ ¿ÉÄÜ»áÈÃÄãÏÝÈëÎÞÖúÖ®µØ¡£
If your business needs to be able to rely on support,
the only way is to have all the necessary sources and
tools. Then you can hire any available person to fix
your problem; you are not at the mercy of any
individual. With Unix, the price of sources puts this
out of consideration for most businesses. With GNU this
will be easy. It is still possible for there to be no
available competent person, but this problem cannot be
blamed on distribution arrangements. GNU does not
eliminate all the world's problems, only some of them.
Èç¹ûÄãµÄÊÂÒµÐèÒªÒп¿Ö§Ô®·þÎñ£¬Î¨Ò»µÄ·½·¨¾ÍÊÇ×¼±¸ºÃÒ»ÇÐ
ËùÐèµÄÔʼÂë ºÍ¹¤¾ß¡£È»ááÄã¿ÉÒÔƸÇëÈκÎһλ¿ÉÒÔʤÈεÄÈË
À´½â¾öÄãµÄÎÊÌâ¡£Äã²» ÐëÈÎÓÉijÈË°Ú²¼¡£¾ÍUNIX¶øÑÔ£¬ÔʼÂë
µÄ¼ÛÇ®Èô󲿷ֵÄÆóÒµÎÞ·¨¿¼ÂÇ ÕâÖÖ×÷·¨¡£ÓÃGNU µÄ»°Õâ¾ÍºÜ
ÈÝÒ×ÁË¡£µ«ÊÇ»¹ÊÇÓпÉÄÜÕÒ²»µ½¿ÉÒÔʤÈÎ µÄÈ˵ÄÇé¿ö£¬µ«ÊÇÕâ
¸öÎÊÌâ²»ÄܹÖ×ï´«²¥µÄ·½·¨¡£GNU ²¢Ã»Óнâ¾öÊÀ½ç ÉÏËùÓеÄÎÊ
Ì⣬ֻÊÇÆäÖеÄÒ»²¿·Ý¶øÒÑ¡£
Meanwhile, the users who know nothing about computers
need handholding: doing things for them which they
could easily do themselves but don't know how.
ͬʱ£¬¶ÔµçÄÔÒ»ÎÞËùÖªµÃʹÓÃÕßÐëÒª°ïÖúÓë·þÎñ£ºÎªËûÃÇ×öÒ»
ЩËûÃÇ×Ô¼ºÄÜÇá Ò××öµ½£¬µ«²»ÏþµÃÈçºÎ×öµÄÊ¡£
Such services could be provided by companies that sell
just hand-holding and repair service. If it is true
that users would rather spend money and get a product
with service, they will also be willing to buy the
service having got the product free. The service
companies will compete in quality and price; users will
not be tied to any particular one. Meanwhile, those of
us who don't need the service should be able to use the
program without paying for the service.
ÕâÑù×ӵķþÎñ¿ÉÒÔÓÉרÃÅάÐÞ·þÎñµÄ¹«Ë¾Ìṩ¡£Èç¹ûʹÓÃÕßÕæ
µÄÄþÔ¸»¨ Ç®ÂòÒ»¸öÓÐÊÛáá·þÎñµÄÈíÌ壬ËûÃÇÒ²½«Ô¸ÒâΪÃâ·ÑµÃ
µ½µÄÈíÌåÂòЩ·þÎñ ¡£ÕâЩ·þÎñ¹«Ë¾»áÔÚÆ·ÖʺͼÛÇ®ÉϾºÕù£»Ê¹
ÓÃÕß½«²»»áÊÜÏÞì¶Ìض¨µÄÒ» ¼Ò¹«Ë¾¡£Í¬Ê±£¬ÎÒÃÇÕâЩ²»ÐëÒª·þ
ÎñµÄÈËÒ²Äܹ»×ÔÓɵÄʹÓóÌʽ¶ø²»Ðë Òª»¨Ç®ÔÚ·þÎñÉÏ¡£
"You cannot reach many people without advertising,
and you must charge for the program to support
that."
¡ºÃ»Óйã¸æµÄ»°Äã¾Íû°ì·¨ÈúܶàÈËÖªµÀÄãµÄ¶«Î÷£¬ ¶øÄã
±ØÐë¶Ô³ÌʽÊÕÇ®ÒÔÖ§³Ö¹ã¸æ¾·Ñ¡£¡»
"It's no use advertising a program people can get
free."
¡º¹ã¸æÒ»¸ö±ðÈË¿ÉÒÔÃâ·ÑµÃµ½µÄ³ÌʽÊÇûÓÐÓõġ£¡»
There are various forms of free or very cheap publicity
that can be used to inform numbers of computer users
about something like GNU. But it may be true that one
can reach more microcomputer users with advertising. If
this is really so, a business which advertises the
service of copying and mailing GNU for a fee ought to
be successful enough to pay for its advertising and
more. This way, only the users who benefit from the
advertising pay for it.
ÓжàÖÖÐÎʽÃâ·ÑµÄ»òºÜ±ãÒ˵Ĵ«²¥Ã½½é¿ÉÒÔÓÃÀ´Èò»ÉٵĵçÄÔ
ʹÓÃÕßÖª µÀÏñGNU Ö®ÀàµÄÊ¡£¿ÉÊÇ¿¯µÇ¹ã¸æ¿ÉÒÔ´¥¼°¸ü¶à΢µç
ÄÔµÄʹÓÃÕß¿ÉÄÜÊÇ ÕæµÄ¡£Èç¹ûÊÇÕâÑùµÄ»°£¬Ò»¸ö¿¯µÇ¹ã¸æÌṩ
¿½±´¼°ÓʹºGNU µÄÊÂÒµÓ¦¸Ã ¿ÉÒÔ׬µÃÔ¶³¬¹ýËüËùͶ×ʵĹã¸æ
·Ñ¡£ÔÚÕâÖÖ»úÖÆÏ£¬Ö»Óдӹã¸æÖлñÒæ µÄʹÓÃÕß²ÅÐëҪΪ֮¸¶
·Ñ¡£
On the other hand, if many people get GNU from their
friends, and such companies don't succeed, this will
show that advertising was not really necessary to
spread GNU. Why is it that free market advocates don't
want to let the free market decide this?
ÁíÒ»·½Ã棬Èç¹ûºÜ¶àÈË͸¹ýÅóÓÑÄõ½GNU £¬¶øÉÏÊöµÄÊÂҵûÓÐ
³É¹¦£¬Õâ ¾ÍÏÔʾÁËGNU ²¢²»ÐëÒª½èÖú¹ã¸æÀ´´«²¥¡£ÎªÊ²÷á×ÔÓÉ
Êг¡µÄÓµ»¤Õß²»Èà ×ÔÓÉÊг¡¾ö¶¨Õâ¼þÊ£¿
"My company needs a proprietary operating system to
get a competitive edge."
¡ºÎҵĹ«Ë¾ÐèÒªÒ»¸öרÊôµÄ×÷ҵϵͳ²ÅÄܹ»½ÏÓоºÕùÁ¦
¡£¡»
GNU will remove operating system software from the
realm of competition. You will not be able to get an
edge in this area, but neither will your competitors be
able to get an edge over you. You and they will compete
in other areas, while benefitting mutually in this one.
If your business is selling an operating system, you
will not like GNU, but that's tough on you. If your
business is something else, GNU can save you from being
pushed into the expensive business of selling operating
systems.
GNU ½«»á°ÑϵͳÈíÌåÒƳö¾ºÕùµÄÁìÓò¡£Ä㽫ÎÞ·¨ÔÚÕâ·½ÃæÕ¼ÓÐ
ÓÅÊÆ£¬µ«Í¬ ÑùµÄÄãµÄ¶ÔÊÖÒ²ÎÞ·¨ÔÚÕâ·½Ãæʤ¹ýÄã¡£ÄãºÍËûÃÇ»á
ÔÚÆäËû·½Ã澺Õù£¬¶øÔÚ Õâ·½Ã滥Ïà»ñÒæ¡£Èç¹ûÄãµÄÊÂÒµ¾ÍÊÇÂô
×÷ҵϵͳ£¬Äã´ó¸Å²»»áϲ»¶GNU £¬ ²»¹ýÕâ»áºÜΪÄÑÄã¡£Èç¹ûÄã
µÄÊÂÒµÊÇÆäËû·½ÃæµÄ»°£¬GNU ¿ÉÒÔÈÃÄãÊ¡ÏÂÑÐ ·¢×÷ҵϵͳËùÐè
ÒªµÄ°º¹ó¾·Ñ¡£
I would like to see GNU development supported by gifts
from many manufacturers and users, reducing the cost to
each.
ÎÒÏ£ÍûÄܼûµ½GNU µÄ·¢Õ¹Êܵ½Ðí¶àÖÆÔìÉ̼°Ê¹ÓÃÕßµÄÖ§³Ö£¬ÒÔ
¼õµÍË«·½µÄ ·¢·Ñ¡£
"Don't programmers deserve a reward for their
creativity?"
¡ºÄѵÀ³Ìʽʦ²»Ó¦¸Ã´ÓËûµÄ´´ÔìÁ¦»ñµÃ»Ø±¨Â𣿡»
If anything deserves a reward, it is social
contribution. Creativity can be a social contribution,
but only in so far as society is free to use the
results. If programmers deserve to be rewarded for
creating innovative programs, by the same token they
deserve to be punished if they restrict the use of
these programs.
Èç¹ûÓÐÉõ÷áÊÂÖµµÃ»Ø±¨µÄ»°£¬ÄǷǹ±Ï×Éç»áĪÊýÁË¡£´´ÔìÁ¦¿É
ÒÔÊÇÒ»ÖÖ ¶ÔÉç»áµÄ¹±Ï×£¬µ«ÊDZØÐëÒÔÉç»áÄܹ»×ÔÓÉʹÓÃÆä½á¹û
ΪÏÞ¡£Èç¹û³Ìʽʦ Òòд³ö´´ÐµijÌʽ¾ÍÓ¦µÃµ½±¨³êµÄ»°£¬Í¬Àí
Èç¹ûËûÃǶÔÕâЩ³ÌʽµÄʹÓà ÉèÏ޵Ļ°£¬ËûÃÇÒ²¸ÃÊÜ·£¡£
"Shouldn't a programmer be able to ask for a reward
for his creativity?"
¡ºÄѵÀ³Ìʽʦ²»ÄÜΪËûµÄ´´ÔìÁ¦ÒªÇ󱨳êÂ𣿡»
There is nothing wrong with wanting pay for work, or
seeking to maximize one's income, as long as one does
not use means that are destructive. But the means
customary in the field of software today are based on
destruction.
Ï£Íû¹¤×÷ÓÐнˮÄ㬻òÊÇʹ×Ô¼ºÓÐ×î´óµÄÊÕÈ벢ûÓÐʲ÷á²»¶Ô
µÄ£¬Ö»Òª ²»ÒªÓÃÆÆ»µÐÔµÄÊֶξͿÉÒÔÁË¡£µ«ÊÇÔÚÏÖ½ñÈíÌåÁìÓò
ÄÚ³£ÓõÄÊÖ¶ÎÈ´¶¼ ÊÇÒÔÆÆ»µ/û½¨ÉèÐÔµÄÊÖ¶ÎΪÒÀ¹éµÄ¡£
Extracting money from users of a program by restricting
their use of it is destructive because the restrictions
reduce the amount and the ways that the program can be
used. This reduces the amount of wealth that humanity
derives from the program. When there is a deliberate
choice to restrict, the harmful consequences are
deliberate destruction.
½åÖøÏÞÖÆÒ»¸ö³ÌʽµÄʹÓÃÕßµÄʹÓáõΧÀ´»ñÈ¡½ðÇ®ÊǾßÓÐÆÆ»µ
ÐԵģ¬Òò ΪÄÇЩÏÞÖƼõÉÙÁ˳ÌʽµÄÓ¦ÓáõΧ¡£Õâ¼õÉÙÁËÈËÀàÄÜ
Óɴ˳ÌʽËùµÃµ½µÄ ²Æ¸»¡£Èç¹û¿ÉÒÔÈÎÒâÉ趨ÏÞÖƵĻ°£¬Æä¶ñ¹û
¾ÍÊÇÈÎÒâµÄÆÆ»µ¡£
The reason a good citizen does not use such destructive
means to become wealthier is that, if everyone did so,
we would all become poorer from the mutual
destructiveness. This is Kantian ethics; or, the Golden
Rule. Since I do not like the consequences that result
if everyone hoards information, I am required to
consider it wrong for one to do so. Specifically, the
desire to be rewarded for one's creativity does not
justify depriving the world in general of all or part
of that creativity.
Ò»¸öºÃ¹«Ãñ²»»áÓÃÕâ÷áÓÐÆÆ»µÐÔµÄÊÖ¶ÎÀ´Ö¸»µÄÔÒòÊÇ£¬Èç¹û
´ó¼Ò¶¼Õâ Ñù×öµÄ»°£¬ÎÒÃÇ»áÒòΪ±Ë´ËµÄ»¥Ï๥»÷¶ø±äµÃ¸üÇî¡£
ÕâÊDz»±äµÄÕæÀí£¬ »òÕß˵Êǽð¿ÆÓñÂÉ¡£ÒòΪÎÒ²»Ô¸¼ûµ½Ã¿¸öÈË
¶¼²Ø˽µÄáá¹û£¬ËùÒÔÎÒÈÏΪ ÕâÑù×öÊDz»¶ÔµÄ¡£ÌرðÊÇ£¬ÏëÒªÓÉ
´´ÔìÁ¦»ñµÃ±¨³êµÄÓûÍû²¢²»Äܵ±³ÉÀûÓà ´Ë´´ÐÂÀ´²¦Ï÷Õâ¸öÊÀ½ç
µÄ½è¿Ú¡£
"Won't programmers starve?"
¡º³Ìʽʦ»áû¹¤×÷¶ø°¤¶öÂð?¡»
I could answer that nobody is forced to be a
programmer. Most of us cannot manage to get any money
for standing on the street and making faces. But we are
not, as a result, condemned to spend our lives standing
on the street making faces, and starving. We do
something else.
ÎÒ¿ÉÒԻشð˵£¬Ã»ÓÐÈ˱»Ç¿Æȵ±³Ìʽʦ°¡£¡ÎÒÃÇÒ»°ãÈËû°ì·¨
Õ¾ÔÚ½ÖÉÏ °ç¹íÁ³¾Í¿ÉÒÔ׬ǮµÄ¡£µ«ÊÇÎÒÃÇÒ²Òò´Ë²»ÊÇ×¢¶¨ÒªÒ»
±²×ÓÕ¾ÔÚ½ÖÉÏ°ç¹í Á³£¬È»áá°¤¶ö¡£ÎÒÃÇ»¹×öÆäËûµÄÊ¡£
But that is the wrong answer because it accepts the
questioner's implicit assumption: that without
ownership of software, programmers cannot possibly be
paid a cent. Supposedly it is all or nothing.
¿ÉÊÇÕâÖֻشðÊÇ´íÎóµÄ£¬ÒòΪËüÈÏͬÎÊÌâ±¾ÉíÒþº¬µÄ¼ÙÉ裺Èç
¹ûûÓÐÒ» Ì×ÈíÌåµÄËùÓÐȨµÄ»°£¬Ã»ÓÐÈ˻Ḷ³ÌʽʦһëǮ¡£ÔÚ
´ó¼ÒµÄÏëÏñÀÕâ ºÃÏñÊÇÓöþ·Ö·¨·Ö¿ªµÄ£¬²»ÊÇÈ«ÓУ¬¾ÍÊÇÈ«
ÎÞ¡£
The real reason programmers will not starve is that it
will still be possible for them to get paid for
programming; just not paid as much as now.
ÈóÌʽʦ²»»á°¤¶öµÄÕæÕýÔÒòÊÇËûÃÇÈÔÈ»¿ÉÒÔ¿¿Éè¼Æ³Ìʽ׬
Ç®¡£Ö»ÊÇû ÓÐÏñÏÖÔÚÄÇ÷á¶à°ÕÁË¡£
Restricting copying is not the only basis for business
in software. It is the most common basis because it
brings in the most money. If it were prohibited, or
rejected by the customer, software business would move
to other bases of organization which are now used less
often. There are always numerous ways to organize any
kind of business.
ÏÞÖÆÈíÌåµÄ¿½±´²¢²»ÊÇ×öÈíÌåÉúÒâµÄΨһÊֶΡ£ÕâÊÇ×î³£ÓõÄ
·½·¨ÒòΪ ÕâÑù×Ó׬×î¶àÇ®¡£Èç¹ûÕâÖÖ·½·¨±»ÏÞÖÆ£¬»òÕß±»¿Í»§
¾Ü¾øµÄ»°£¬ÈíÌåÊ ҵ¾Í»áÓÃÆäËûÏÖÔڱȽÏÉÙÓõķ½·¨¡£ÊÀÉÏÓÀ
Ô¶ÓкܶàÖÖ·½·¨À´×éÖ¯ÈκΠһÖÖÊÂÒµµÄ¡£
Probably programming will not be as lucrative on the
new basis as it is now. But that is not an argument
against the change. It is not considered an injustice
that sales clerks make the salaries that they now do.
If programmers made the same, that would not be an
injustice either. (In practice they would still make
considerably more than that.)
ÔÚ´ËеĻ·¾³ÖУ¬³ÌʽÉè¼Æ¿ÉÄܲ»ÔÙÏñÏÖÔÚÓÐÕâ÷á¸ßµÄÀûÈó¡£
µ«ÊÇÕâ²» ÊÇÓÃÀ´·´¶ÔÕâÖָıäµÄÀíÓÉ¡£Ã»ÓÐÈËÈÏΪÏúÊÛԱĿǰ
µÄнˮÊDz»¹«Æ½µÄ £¬Èç¹û³Ìʽʦ׬һÑù¶àÇ®£¬ÄÇÒ²²»»á²»¹«Æ½
ÁË¡££¨ÊÂʵÉÏ£¬ËûÃÇÈÔÈ»¿É ÒÔ׬±ÈÕâÑù¶àºÜ¶àµÄÇ®¡££©
"Don't people have a right to control how their
creativity is used?"
¡ºÄѵÀÈËÃDz»Ó¦ÓпØÖÆËûÃǵĴ´ÔìÁ¦¸ÃÈçºÎÔËÓõÄȨÁ¦Âð
?¡»
"Control over the use of one's ideas" really
constitutes control over other people's lives; and it
is usually used to make their lives more difficult."
"¿ØÖÆijÈËÈçºÎÔËÓÃËûµÄµã×Ó" ʵ¼ÊÉÏ°üº¬ÁË¿ØÖÆËûÈ˵ÄÉú»î;
¶øÇÒͨ³£»áʹµÃËûÃǵÄÈÕ×Ó¸üÄѹý¡£"
People who have studied the issue of intellectual
property rights carefully (such as lawyers) say that
there is no intrinsic right to intellectual property.
The kinds of supposed intellectual property rights that
the government recognizes were created by specific acts
of legislation for specific purposes.
ÏñÂÉʦµÈ×ÐϸÑо¿¹ýÖǻ۲ƲúȨÎÊÌâµÄÈËÈÏΪʵ¼ÊÉÏÖǻ۲Ʋú
Ȩ²¢·Ç¹Ì ÓеÄ( ÌìÉúµÄ) ȨÁ¦¡£Õþ¸®ËùÈÏͬµÄÄÇÖÖÖǻ۲ƲúȨ
ÊÇΪÁËÌض¨µÄÄ¿µÄ ¶ø͸¹ýÌرðµÄÁ¢·¨³ÌÐò´´Ôì³öÀ´µÄ¡£
For example, the patent system was established to
encourage inventors to disclose the details of their
inventions. Its purpose was to help society rather than
to help inventors. At the time, the life span of 17
years for a patent was short compared with the rate of
advance of the state of the art. Since patents are an
issue only among manufacturers, for whom the cost and
effort of a license agreement are small compared with
setting up production, the patents often do not do much
harm. They do not obstruct most individuals who use
patented products.
¾ÙÀý¶øÑÔ, רÀûÖƶÈÊÇΪÁ˹ÄÀø·¢Ã÷Õß¹«¿ªËûÃǵķ¢Ã÷µÄÏêϸ
ÄÚÈݶøÉè µÄ¡£ËûµÄÄ¿µÄÊÇΪÁË°ïÖúÕû¸öÉç»á£¬¶ø²»ÊÇ·¢Ã÷Õß¡£
ÔÚÄÇʱºò17ÄêµÄר ÀûÓÐЧÆÚÏà¶Ô춿Ƽ¼µÄ½ø²½ÊÇÏ൱¶ÌµÄ¡£Òò
ΪרÀûȨֻÊÇÖÆÔìÉÌÖ®¼äµÄ ÎÊÌ⣬¶øÇÒ¶ÔËûÃǶøÑÔ£¬Ç©Ò»¸öר
ÀûºÏÔ¼µÄ¸ºµ£ºÍÁ¿²ú±È½Ï¿ÉÒÔ˵ºÜС £¬ËùÒÔרÀûȨ¶ÔËûÃǶøÑÔ
ͨ³£²»»áÓÐʲ÷áÉ˺¦¡£ËûÃÇûÓзÁ°µ½Ê¹ÓÃר Àû²úÆ·µÄ¸öÈË¡£
The idea of copyright did not exist in ancient times,
when authors frequently copied other authors at length
in works of non-fiction. This practice was useful, and
is the only way many authors' works have survived even
in part. The copyright system was created expressly for
the purpose of encouraging authorship. In the domain
for which it was invented--books, which could be copied
economically only on a printing press--it did little
harm, and did not obstruct most of the individuals who
read the books.
¹Åʱºò²¢Ã»ÓÐÖǻ۲ƲúȨµÄ¸ÅÄÓÐÒ»¶ÎºÜ³¤µÄʱ¼äÔÚ·ÇС˵
µÄÁìÓòÀï Ã棬×÷Õß³£³£ÒýÓÃËûÈ˵Ä×÷Æ·¡£ÕâÖÖ¶¯×÷ÊǷdz£ÓÐÓÃ
µÄ£¬¶øÇÒÕâÒ²ÊÇºÜ ¶à×÷ÕßµÄ×÷Æ·Äܹ»²¿·Ý±»±£ÁôÏÂÀ´µÄΨһ;
¾¶¡£Öǻ۲ƲúȨϵͳÔÊÇÉè Á¢À´¹ÄÀø´´×÷µÄ¡£ÔÚÖǻ۲ƲúȨÔ
ÏÈ·¢Ã÷µÄÁìÓò£¨Êé¼®£©ÄÚ£¬Ö»ÓÐÓ¡Ë¢ ¹«Ë¾²ÅÄܾܺ¼ÃµÄ´óÁ¿¸´
ÖƵÄÇé¿öÏ£¬Ëü²¢Ã»ÓÐʲ÷Ầ´¦£¬²¢ÇÒûÓзÁ °µ½´ó²¿·ÝµÄ¶Á
Õß¡£
All intellectual property rights are just licenses
granted by society because it was thought, rightly or
wrongly, that society as a whole would benefit by
granting them. But in any particular situation, we have
to ask: are we really better off granting such license?
What kind of act are we licensing a person to do?
ËùÓеÄÖǻ۲ƲúȨֻ²»¹ýÊÇÉç»áËù¸øÓèµÄȨÏÞ£¬ÒòΪ²»¹ÜÕâÑù
×ÓµÄÏë·¨ ÊÇ·ñÕýÈ·£¬Ò»°ãÈÏΪ¸øÓèÕâ¸öȨÀû¿ÉÒÔ¶ÔÕâÕû¸öÉç»á
ÓÐËù°ïÖú¡£µ«ÊÇ ÎÒÃDZØÐë¸ö°¸Ë¼¿¼£ºÎÒÃǸøÓèÕâЩȨÀûááÕæµÄ
±äµÃ¸üºÃÁËÂð£¿ÎÒÃǵ½ µ×ÔÊÈ¡ÁËʲ÷á¡õΧµÄÊÚȨ£¿
The case of programs today is very different from that
of books a hundred years ago. The fact that the easiest
way to copy a program is from one neighbor to another,
the fact that a program has both source code and object
code which are distinct, and the fact that a program is
used rather than read and enjoyed, combine to create a
situation in which a person who enforces a copyright is
harming society as a whole both materially and
spiritually; in which a person should not do so
regardless of whether the law enables him to.
ÒÔ½ñÈÕ³ÌʽÈíÌåµÄÇé¿ö¶øÑÔ£¬ÊÇÓëÒ»°ÙÄêÇ°µÄÊé¼®µÄÇé¿öåÄÈ»
²»Í¬µÄ¡£ ¿½±´Ò»¸ö³Ìʽ×î¼òµ¥µÄ·½·¨¾ÍÊÇÏòÁÚ½üµÄÈËË÷È¡£¬Ò»
¸ö³ÌʽÓб¾ÖÊ»¥Òì µÄÔʼÂëÓëÄ¿µÄÂ룬ÒÔ¼°Ò»¸ö³ÌʽÊÇÄÃÀ´ÓÃ
µÄ£¬¶ø²»ÊÇÓÃÀ´ÔĶÁÓëÓéÀÖ µÄ±¾ÖÊ£¬½áºÏÔÚÒ»ÆðÐγÉÁËÒ»¸öÌØ
ÊâµÄÇé¿ö£»ÄǾÍÊÇÒ»¸öÈËÈç¹ûÇ¿ÐÐÊ© ÓÃÖǻ۲ƲúȨµÄ»°£¬¾Í»á
¶ÔÕû¸öÉç»á£¬²»ÂÛÊÇÎïÖÊÉÏ»òÕßÊǾ«ÉñÉÏ£¬Ôì ³ÉÉ˺¦¡£ËùÒÔÒ»
¸öÈ˲»Ó¦¸ÃÕâÑù×ö£¬²»¹Ü·¨ÂÉÔʲ»ÔÊÐíËûÕâ÷á×ö¡£
"Competition makes things get done better."
¡º¾ºÕù¿ÉÒÔ´Ù½ø½ø²½¡»
The paradigm of competition is a race: by rewarding the
winner, we encourage everyone to run faster. When
capitalism really works this way, it does a good job;
but its defenders are wrong in assuming it always works
this way. If the runners forget why the reward is
offered and become intent on winning, no matter how,
they may find other strategies--such as, attacking
other runners. If the runners get into a fist fight,
they will all finish late.
¾ºÕùµÄµäÐÍÀý×Ó¾ÍÊÇÈüÅÜÁË£ºÍ¸¹ý¸øÓèʤÀûÕß½±Æ·£¬ÎÒÃǹÄÀø
´ó¼ÒÅÜ¿ì Ò»µã¡£×ʱ¾Ö÷Òå¾ÍÊÇÕâÑùÔË×÷µÄ£¬¶øÇÒÕâÖÖ»úÖÆ×öµÄ
²»´í£»µ«ÊÇËûµÄÖ§ ³ÖÕßÈ´·¸ÁËÒ»¸ö´íÎ󣬾ÍÊǼÙÉèÕâÖÖ»úÖÆÓÀ
Ô¶ÊÇ¿ÉÐеġ£¼ÙÉ辺ÅÜÕßÍü Á˸ø½±Æ·µÄ¹¦Ó㬶øÖ»ÇóʤÀûµÄ
»°£¬ÎÞÂÛÈçºÎ£¬ËûÃÇ¿ÉÄÜ»áʹÓÃÆäËûµÄ ÊֶΡªÈ磬¹¥»÷ÆäËûµÄ
ÅÜÕß¡£Èç¹ûÈüÅܱä³ÉÁËÒ»³¡È¼ÜµÄ»°£¬ÄÇ´ó¼Ò¶¼ »á»¨¸ü¶àµÄʱ
¼äµ½´ïÖյ㡣
Proprietary and secret software is the moral equivalent
of runners in a fist fight. Sad to say, the only
referee we've got does not seem to object to fights; he
just regulates them ("For every ten yards you run, you
are allowed one kick."). He really ought to break them
up, and penalize runners for even trying to fight.
רÊôÈíÌåÓëÃØÃÜÈíÌå¾ÍÊǵÀµÂÉϵȼÛì¶È¼ÜÖеÄÅÜÕß¡£ÎÒºÜÄÑ
¹ýµÄ˵£¬ Ä¿Ç°·¢ÏÖµÄΨһµ÷Í£ÕߺÃÏñ²¢²»·´¶Ô´ò¼Ü£»Ëû½ö½ö½Ú
ÖÆËûÃǶøÒÑ£¨Äãÿ ÅÜÊ®Â룬¿ÉÒÔÌßһϣ©ËûÕæµÄÓ¦¸Ã°ÑËûÃǼÜ
¿ª£¬È»áá³Í·£ÄÇЩÉõÖÁ½öÓÐ ´ò¼ÜÒâͼµÄÅÜÕß¡£
"Won't everyone stop programming without a monetary
incentive?"
¡º»á²»»áÒòΪûÓнðÇ®ÉϵÄÓÕÒò¶ø´ó¼Ò¶¼Í£Ö¹Ð´³ÌʽÁË
ÄØ£¿¡»
Actually, many people will program with absolutely no
monetary incentive. Programming has an irresistible
fascination for some people, usually the people who are
best at it. There is no shortage of professional
musicians who keep at it even though they have no hope
of making a living that way.
ʵ¼ÊÉÏ£¬ÓкܶàµÄÈ˼´Ê¹Ã»ÓÐÈκεijêÀÍÒ²Ô¸Òâд³Ìʽ¡£Ð´³Ì
ʽ¶ÔijЩ È˶øÑÔ¾ßÓÐÖøÄÑÒÔ¿¹¾ÜµÄÎüÒýÁ¦£¬Í¨³£ÊÇÄÇЩºÜ¾«Í¨
д³ÌʽµÄÄÇȺ¡£¼´ ʹÕâÑù×ö¼¸ºõ²»¿ÉÄÜÒÔ´Ëά³ÖËûÃǵÄÉú¼Æ£¬
µ«ÊÇÒ²´ÓÀ´²»È±·¦Î¬³ÖÕâÖÖ ÔÔòµÄרҵ¼¶ÒôÀÖ¼Ò¡£
But really this question, though commonly asked, is not
appropriate to the situation. Pay for programmers will
not disappear, only become less. So the right question
is, will anyone program with a reduced monetary
incentive? My experience shows that they will.
µ«ÊÇËäÈ»Õâ¸öÎÊÌâ³£³£±»Îʵ½£¬È´²»ÊÇʵ¼ÊÉϻᷢÉúµÄ×´¿ö¡£
¸¶·Ñ¸ø³Ì ʽʦµÄ×´¿ö²»¿ÉÄÜ»áÏûʧ£¬Ö»ÊÇ»á±ãÉÙ¶øÒÑ¡£ËùÒÔÕý
È·µÄÎÊÌâÓ¦¸ÃÊÇ£¬ ÓÐÈËÔ¸ÒâΪһ¸ö½ÏÉٵijêÀÍд³ÌʽÂð£¿ÎÒµÄ
¾Ñé¸æËßÎÒÕæµÄÓÐÈËÔ¸Òâ¡£
For more than ten years, many of the world's best
programmers worked at the Artificial Intelligence Lab
for far less money than they could have had anywhere
else. They got many kinds of non-monetary rewards: fame
and appreciation, for example. And creativity is also
fun, a reward in itself.
Óг¬¹ýÊ®ÄêµÄʱ¼ä£¬È«ÊÀ½çÓкܶඥ¼âµÄ³ÌʽÉè¼ÆÕßÔڣͣɣÔ
µÄÈ˹¤ÖÇ »ÛʵÑéÊÒ¹¤×÷£»²¢ÇÒÄÃÁ˽ϱð´¦ÉÙµÄÇ®¡£ËûÃǵõ½ÁË
ºÜ¶à·Ç½ðÇ®É쵀ȯ À¡£¬ÀýÈ磺ÃûÓþºÍ¼¤ÉÍ¡£¶øÇÒ´´ÔìÒ²ºÜÓÐ
Ȥ£¬Ëü±¾Éí¾ÍÊÇÒ»ÖÖ±¨³ê¡£
Then most of them left when offered a chance to do the
same interesting work for a lot of money.
È»ááËûÃÇÖ®ÖеĴ󲿷ÖÈç¹ûÄܵõ½Ò»¸öÒ»ÑùÓÐȤ£¬¶øÇÒÓкܶà
Ç®µÄ¹¤×÷ »ú»áʱ¾ÍÀëÈ¥ÁË¡£
What the facts show is that people will program for
reasons other than riches; but if given a chance to
make a lot of money as well, they will come to expect
and demand it. Low-paying organizations do poorly in
competition with high-paying ones, but they do not have
to do badly if the high-paying ones are banned.
Õâ¸öÊÂʵÏÔʾÁËÈË»¹ÊÇ»áΪÁ˲Ƹ»ÒÔÍâµÄ¶«Î÷д³Ìʽ£»µ«ÊÇÈç
¹ûÓиö׬ ´óÇ®µÄ»ú»á£¬ÄÇËûÃǾͻáÆÚ´ý¡¢ÕùÇóËü¡£Ð½×ʵ͵Ä×é
Ö¯µÄ¾ºÕùÁ¦Ò»¶¨±È н×ʸߵÄ×éÖ¯²î£¬µ«ÊÇÈç¹û½ûÖ¹¸ßнÕþ²ßµÄ
»°ÄǾͲ»Ò»¶¨½Ï²îµÄ¡£
"We need the programmers desperately. If they
demand that we stop helping our neighbors, we have
to obey."
¡ºÎÒÃǷdz£ÆÈÇеÄÐèÒª³ÌʽԱ¡£Èç¹ûËûÃÇÒªÎÒÃÇÍ£Ö¹°ïÖú
ÁÚ½üµÄâ·°éµÄ»°£¬ÎÒÃǾÍÒªÌýËûÃǵĻ°¡£¡»
You're never so desperate that you have to obey this
sort of demand. Remember: millions for defense, but not
a cent for tribute!
ÄãÓÀÔ¶²»»áÆÈÇе½±ØÐë×ñ´ÓÕâÖÖÒªÇóµÄµØ²½¡£¼Çסһ¾ä»°£ºÄþ
Ô¸»¨¼¸°Ù ÍòÀ´×ö·ÀÓù¹¤Ê£¬Ò²²»Ô¸½ø¹±Ò»·ÖÇ®¡£(millions
for defense, but not a cent for tribute!)
"Programmers need to make a living somehow."
¡ºÎÞÂÛÈçºÎ³ÌʽÉè¼ÆʦҲҪά³ÖÉú¼Æ°¡!¡»
In the short run, this is true. However, there are
plenty of ways that programmers could make a living
without selling the right to use a program. This way is
customary now because it brings programmers and
businessmen the most money, not because it is the only
way to make a living. It is easy to find other ways if
you want to find them. Here are a number of examples.
¶Ì³Ì¶øÑÔ£¬ÕâÊÇÕæµÄ¡£ÎÞÂÛÈçºÎ£¬³Ìʽʦ»¹Óкܶ಻ÐèÒª··Âô
ÈíÌåʹÓà ȨҲ¿ÉÒÔά³ÖÉú¼ÆµÄ·½·¨¡£··ÂôÈíÌåʹÓÃȨÊÇÄ¿Ç°ÆÕ
±éµÄ·½·¨ÊÇÒòΪËü °ï³ÌʽʦºÍÉÌÈË׬×î¶àµÄÇ®£¬¶ø²»ÊÇÒòΪËû
ÊÇά³ÖÉú¼ÆµÄΨһ·½·¨¡£Èç ¹ûÄãÔ¸ÒâÕÒÆäËû·½·¨µÄ»°Ò²ºÜÈÝ
Òס£ÕâÀï¾ÍÓм¸¸ö¡õÀý£º
A manufacturer introducing a new computer will pay for
the porting of operating systems onto the new hardware.
Ò»¸öÖÆÔì³öеĵçÄÔϵͳµÄÖÆÔìÉÌÒª¸ºÔð³öÒÆÖ²×÷ҵϵͳµ½ÐÂ
»úÆ÷µÄÇ®¡£
The sale of teaching, hand-holding and maintenance
services could also employ programmers.
½Ìѧ¡¢ÈíÌåάÐ޵ȷþÎñÒ²ÐèÒª³Ìʽʦ¡£
People with new ideas could distribute programs as
freeware, asking for donations from satisfied users, or
selling hand-holding services. I have met people who
are already working this way successfully.
ÓÐеã×ÓµÄÈË¿ÉÒÔ°ÑËûÃǵijÌʽÒÔfreewareµÄÐÎʽÁ÷³ö£¬È»áá
ÒªÇóÂúÒâ µÄʹÓÃÕß¾èÏ×£¬»òÕßÊÇÌṩ֧Ԯ·þÎñµÈ¡£ÎÒÓö¹ýÓÃÕâ
ÖÖ·½·¨´³³öһƬ ÌìµØµÄÈË¡£
Users with related needs can form users' groups, and
pay dues. A group would contract with programming
companies to write programs that the group's members
would like to use.
ÓÐÏàͬÐèÇóµÄʹÓÃÕß¿ÉÒÔ×é³ÉʹÓÃÕß×éÖ¯£¬È»áá½É»á·Ñ¡£Ò»¸ö
ÍÅÌå¿ÉÒÔºÍ ³ÌʽÉè¼Æ¹«Ë¾Ç°ºÏԼдһЩ¸Ã×éÖ¯³ÉÔ±ÓÐÐËȤʹÓÃ
µÄÈíÌå¡£
All sorts of development can be funded with a Software
Tax:
¸÷ÖÖµÄÑз¢¹¤×÷¿ÉÒÔÓÉÈíÌåË°µÄ»ù½ðÖ§³Ö¡£
Suppose everyone who buys a computer has to pay x
percent of the price as a software tax. The government
gives this to an agency like the NSF to spend on
software development.
¼ÙÉèÿ¸öÂòµçÄÔµÄÈ˶¼Òª¸¶£ø£¥µÄÇ®×÷ΪÈíÌåË°¡£È»ááÕþ¸®°Ñ
Õâ±ÊÇ®½» ¸øÒ»¸öÀàËÆFSF µÄ×éÖ¯¸ºÔðÈíÌåµÄ·¢Õ¹¡£
But if the computer buyer makes a donation to software
development himself, he can take a credit against the
tax. He can donate to the project of his own
choosing--often, chosen because he hopes to use the
results when it is done. He can take a credit for any
amount of donation up to the total tax he had to pay.
µ«ÊÇÈç¹ûµçÄÔ¹ºÂòÕ߶ÔÈíÌåµÄ·¢Õ¹ÓÐËù¹±Ï׵Ļ°£¬ÄÇËû¿ÉÒÔ¼õ
Ë°¡£Ëû¿É ÒÔ×Ô¼ºÑ¡ÔñÒª¹±Ï×Äĸö¼Æ»¡ªÍ¨³£Ñ¡ÄÇЩËû×îÏ£ÍûÄÜ
¹»×öµ½µÄ¼Æ»¡£¼õ Ë°¿ÉÒÔÒÀ¹±Ï׳̶ȼõµ½µÖÏûµôÈ«²¿µÄ˰Ϊ
Ö¹¡£
The total tax rate could be decided by a vote of the
payers of the tax, weighted according to the amount
they will be taxed on.
¶øÈíÌåË°ÂÊ¿ÉÒÀ×ÜÄÉË°¶î¾ö¶¨£¬Æä±ÈÖØ¿ÉÒÔÓÉÄÉË°ÈËͶƱ¾ö
¶¨¡£
The consequences:
the computer-using community supports software
development.
this community decides what level of support is
needed.
users who care which projects their share is spent
on can choose this for themselves.
ÕâÑùµÄ½á¹ûÊÇ:
µçÄÔµÄʹÓÃÕßÍÅÌåÖ§³ÖÈíÌåµÄ·¢Õ¹¡£
´ËÍÅÌå¾ö¶¨¸ÃÓÐʲ÷áÑù³Ì¶ÈµÄÖ§Ô®¡£
ÄÇЩ¹ØÐÄ×Ô¼ºÐèÇóµÄ¼Æ»µÄʹÓÃÕß¿ÉÒԲμӸüƻµÄ½øÐС
£
In the long run, making programs free is a step toward
the post-scarcity world, where nobody will have to work
very hard just to make a living. People will be free to
devote themselves to activities that are fun, such as
programming, after spending the necessary ten hours a
week on required tasks such as legislation, family
counseling, robot repair and asteroid prospecting.
There will be no need to be able to make a living from
programming.
³¤Ô¶À´¿´£¬Ãâ·ÑµÄÌṩÈíÌåÊÇÂõÏò²»ÓÝØÑ·¦µÄÊÀ½çµÄÒ»²½Ö裬
ÔÚÄÇÊÀ½ç ÀïûÓÐÈËÐèҪΪÁËÉú¼Æ¶øÐÁÇڵŤ×÷¡£ÔÚÿ¸öÐÇÆÚ»¨
Á˹̶¨µÄʮСʱ×ö Щ±ØÒªµÄ¹¤×÷£¬ÈçÁ¢·¨¡¢¼ÒÍ¥»áÒé¡¢ÐÞÀí»ú
Æ÷È˺Í̽Ë÷СÐÍÐÇáᣬ´ó¼Ò »áÓÐʱ¼ä´ÓÊÂЩÓÐȤµÄ»î¶¯£¬ÀýÈç
д³Ìʽ¡£ÄÇʱºò¾Í²»ÐëÒª¿¿Ð´³ÌʽÀ´ ¹ý»îÁË¡£
We have already greatly reduced the amount of work that
the whole society must do for its actual productivity,
but only a little of this has translated itself into
leisure for workers because much nonproductive activity
is required to accompany productive activity. The main
causes of this are bureaucracy and isometric struggles
against competition. Free software will greatly reduce
these drains in the area of software production. We
must do this, in order for technical gains in
productivity to translate into less work for us.
ÎÒÃÇ£¨ÀûÓÃÏÖÓеĿƼ¼£©ÒѾ´óÁ¿¼õÉÙÁ˴ﵽĿǰÉú²úÁ¦ËùÐè
ÒªµÄ¹¤×÷ Á¿£¬µ«ÊÇÖ»ÓÐÆäÖеÄÒ»²¿·Ýת»¯³É¹¤×÷ÕߵġõϾ£¬Òò
ΪҪ´ïµ½ÓÐÉú²úÁ¦ µÄ»î¶¯ÍùÍù°éËæÖøºÜ¶àûÓÐÉú²úÁ¦µÄ»î¶¯¡£
Ö÷ÒªµÄÕØÒòÊǹÙÁÅϵͳºÍ¸÷ ÖÖ½ÇÁ¦¶Ô¾ºÕùµÄ×è°¡£×ÔÓÉÈíÌåµÄ
¹ÛÄîÔÚÈíÌåµÄÉú²úÉÏ¿ÉÒÔ´ó´óµÄ¼õÉÙ ÕâÐ©î¿°í¡£ÎªÁËʹ¿Æ¼¼¶Ô
Éú²úÁ¦µÄÔöÒæÄÜʵÖÊÉϼõÉÙÎÒÃǵŤ×÷Á¿£¬ÎÒ ÃDZØÐëÕâ÷á×ö
[GNU¼Æ»®]¡£
Copyright (C) 1985 Richard M. Stallman
±¾ÎÄ°æȨΪRichard M. StallmanËùÓÐ, Copyright (C) 1985
Permission is granted to anyone to make or distribute
verbatim copies of this document as received, in any
medium, provided that the copyright notice and
permission notice are preserved, and that the
distributor grants the recipient permission for further
redistribution as permitted by this notice.
ÈκÎÈËÔÚÄõ½ÕâÎļþµÄͬʱ±ãÊÜÓèËûÒÔÈκÎýÌ帴ÖÆÓë´«²¥±¾
ÎÄÕ ûÓиü¸ÄµÄÔÎĵÄȨÀû£¬Ç°ÌâÊDZ¾°æȨÐû¸æÓëÊÚȨÉùÃ÷±Ø
Ðë±£Áô²» ¶¯£¬¶øÇÒÉ¢²¥Õß±ØÐëÊÜÓè½ÓÊÜÕßÈçͬ±¾ÉùÃ÷Ò»ÑùÔÙ´Î
´«²¥µÄȨÀû¡£
Modified versions may not be made.
±¾ÎIJ»ÔÊÐíÈκθü¸Ä¡£
--
¡ù À´Ô´:£®×Ï ¶¡ Ïã bbs.hit.edu.cn£®[FROM: 202.118.244.16]
Powered by KBS BBS 2.0 (http://dev.kcn.cn)
Ò³ÃæÖ´ÐÐʱ¼ä£º612.957ºÁÃë