English 版 (精华区)
发信人: Porod (扬之水◎Love in One Day), 信区: English
标 题: Panting towards a new path
发信站: 哈工大紫丁香 (Thu Apr 12 09:20:08 2007), 转信
Apr 11th 2007 | NEW YORK
From Economist.com
Chuck Prince fights fat, and buys some time
AFP
WHEN he engineered the merger that created Citigroup, the world’s largest
bank, Sandy Weill said he felt like a rock star. His successor, Chuck Prince
, must have felt more like a busker since taking over from the great dealmaker
in 2003, strumming hard but winning scant applause. Citi’s shares have
lagged those of rivals such as JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, and its
expenses have been growing at twice the pace of revenues. Mr Prince’s efforts
have been so unappreciated that some shareholders have called for his head
. Others suggested a break-up.
Will this week’s overhaul, the first since Citi’s formation almost a decade
ago, take the pressure off the bank’s lawyer-turned-leader? The headline
numbers are big. Some 17,000 jobs are to go, with another 9,500 to be moved
to lower-cost locations. Overall savings within the operations affected
are expected to reach over $4 billion a year by 2009. Management layers will
be stripped away, with more power filtering out to the regions. Middle-
and back-office functions will be crunched together. The bank will cut the
number of American mortgage-origination platforms from five to one, for
instance, and the number of card platforms will drop from twelve to two.
Rationalising technology, procurement and human resources is hardly sexy,
but Citi hopes it will free up enough capital both to boost the bottom line
and to fund expansion in promising areas. Having extinguished its regulatory
fires, the bank is once again eyeing opportunities abroad, particularly
in emerging Europe and Asia. It wants to increase international revenues
to 60% of the total, from 45% today. Robert Druskin, the bank’s chief operating
officer, says the restructuring is as much about putting Citi on a “different
path” as it is about simply paring expenses.
Fine. But airy pledges to “embed continuous improvement methodologies”
will have some wondering how many of the predicted benefits will actually
materialise. By the time Citi announces its first-quarter profits next week
, analysts will once again be focused on the here and now, not tomorrow’
s promised jam.
Moreover, it isn’t clear what the restructuring will do to solve Citi’s
biggest problem: its agglomeration of businesses—brought together, but
not properly integrated, by Mr Weill—still do not gel. The problem is not
unique: Jamie Dimon is wrestling with the same challenge at JPMorgan Chase
. But it is most acute at Citi. Solving it, while simultaneously cutting
costs and making acquisitions that pay off, will be harder than merely identifying
where change needs to come.
Some of the recent deals, such as this week’s $427m purchase of a Taiwanese
bank, seem sensible enough. But news that Citi is in talks to spend $600m
on Old Lane, a hedge fund whose main asset is its founder, Vikram Pandit
, has some worried that savings will be squandered. One commentator asked
if this might be Citi’s “Howard Stern hire”, a reference to the enormous
pay package the shock-jock negotiated with Sirius, a satellite-radio broadcaster
.
The bank admits that overall headcount and expenses will grow as it tries
to pull off the trick of becoming both leaner and bigger. Mr Prince makes
no apologies for that. “I firmly believe you can’t shrink your way to
greatness,” he told staff this week. Shedding flab while gaining weight:
now that is a challenge.
--
困境有一种特殊的科学价值,有智慧的人是不会放弃这个通过它而进行学习的机会的。
※ 来源:·哈工大紫丁香 bbs.hit.edu.cn·[FROM: 211.151.90.150]
Powered by KBS BBS 2.0 (http://dev.kcn.cn)
页面执行时间:3.397毫秒